The Sunday Brew #177
In this brew: Inside a Fusion Reactor in a picture | Crossing the Chasm & Innovator’s Dilemma | Nvidia's $40B AI investment, Scalable Quantum Chips & Amazon Forest Degradation
The Sunday Brew | Issue #2 May ‘26 | Free
Welcome to The Sunday Brew, weekly 1-2-3 newsletter by The Percolator. Every Sunday we drop in your inbox 1 story in a picture, 2 concepts, ideas or frameworks to expand your horizons and 3 news from the week, to keep you updated.
If you are not a paid subscriber, here is what you missed last week:
ONE STORY IN A PICTURE
TWO IDEAS, FRAMEWORKS OR CONCEPTS
This week we bring to you two Concepts: Crossing the Chasm & Innovator’s Dilemma
Crossing the Chasm
Crossing the Chasm is a marketing theory developed by Geoffrey Moore that describes the specific challenge of moving a high-technology product from early adopters to the mainstream market.
This model identifies a significant gap or chasm between the early adopters, who are visionary individuals willing to take risks on unproven technology, and the early majority, who are pragmatists seeking reliable solutions and established references. While innovators and visionaries are often motivated by the potential for a competitive advantage, the mainstream market requires a complete product that is supported by a stable ecosystem and proven results.
Success in the initial phase does not guarantee acceptance in the later stages because the requirements and buying behaviours of these two groups are fundamentally different. To bridge this gap, an organisation must focus on a specific niche market to establish a solid foothold before attempting to expand into broader segments. This focused approach allows a company to build the necessary reputation and infrastructure required to satisfy pragmatic customers.
For founders and business leaders, understanding this concept is vital for managing the transition from a start-up to a sustainable enterprise. It highlights the necessity of shifting strategy from general experimentation to targeted execution when the product reaches a certain level of maturity.
By recognising the unique needs of the early majority, professionals can better allocate their marketing and development resources to ensure long-term growth. This framework prevents the common mistake of overextending a brand before it has secured a dependable customer base.
🚀
Innovator’s Dilemma
The Innovator’s Dilemma describes a situation where successful, well-managed companies fail because they continue to do everything right for their current customers while ignoring new, disruptive technologies.
These organisations focus on sustaining innovations, which are incremental improvements to existing products that satisfy their most profitable clients. Because these companies listen to their best customers and invest in high-margin sectors, they often overlook cheaper or lower-performing alternatives that initially appear unattractive. These emerging technologies typically start in niche markets where established players see little potential for profit.
However, as the disruptive technology improves, it begins to meet the needs of the mainstream market at a lower cost or with greater convenience. By the time the established company recognises the threat, the newcomer has already gained enough momentum and scale to displace the incumbent. This creates a paradox where the very practices that led to a firm’s success, such as focusing on customer needs and financial discipline, ultimately lead to its downfall.
For founders and corporate leaders, this concept highlights the importance of maintaining separate units for experimental projects that do not compete for resources with the core business. It encourages professionals to monitor low-end market entries and under-served segments rather than focusing exclusively on high-value clients.
By understanding this dilemma, leaders can better anticipate when to disrupt their own business models before a competitor does it for them.
An Earnest Appeal
The Percolator is built like a magazine, but without the team or organisation. It takes research, writing, editing, and a steady rhythm to publish longform essays twice a week. Paid subscriptions make this work possible, and sustainable.
If you’ve found value here, I’d love for you to consider upgrading. Paid subscribers unlock every essay, can comment and join the chat, and a chance to feature their own notes and stories.
👉 Please upgrade to paid and help keep the brew strong. It costs less than two coffees a month, but unlike coffee, the energy lasts longer.
THREE NEWS FROM THE WEEK
Nvidia’s $40 Billion AI Investment Surge Raises Questions Over ‘Circular’ Boom
Nvidia has crossed $40 billion in AI-related equity investments in 2026, transforming itself from a dominant chipmaker into one of the most influential financiers of the artificial intelligence ecosystem.
The company’s aggressive dealmaking spans model developers, cloud infrastructure players, and supply chain partners, reflecting a strategy aimed at securing long-term demand for its hardware while shaping the industry’s growth trajectory.
The centerpiece of this push is Nvidia’s reported $30 billion investment in OpenAI, part of a massive $110 billion funding round. Much of that capital is expected to cycle back into Nvidia through purchases of its next-generation AI systems. Similar patterns appear across other deals, including a multibillion-dollar partnership with data center firm IREN and a planned $3.2 billion investment in Corning to expand U.S.-based optical manufacturing.
This structure has sparked concerns about “circular financing,” where Nvidia-backed companies use invested capital to buy Nvidia products, effectively reinforcing its own revenue streams. Analysts have drawn parallels to vendor financing practices seen during the dot-com era, which inflated revenues but later unraveled. However, others argue the comparison is imperfect, noting that today’s AI companies are generating real demand and revenue, supported by Nvidia’s substantial cash flows.
Nvidia maintains that its investments are about strengthening the AI supply chain and accelerating infrastructure buildout. Still, as the company deepens its dual role as both supplier and capital provider, questions persist over whether this strategy represents durable ecosystem building or early signs of financial excess in an overheated AI market.
➖
Moving Qubits Could Unlock Scalable Quantum Chips
A team at Delft University of Technology has demonstrated a breakthrough that could reshape the future of quantum computing: performing two-qubit logic gates using mobile electron spins traveling across a silicon chip.
Published in Nature on May 6, 2026, the research introduces a new architecture where qubits are not fixed in place but physically transported, enabling more flexible and scalable designs.
Led by Lieven Vandersypen at QuTech, the researchers used a method called conveyor-mode shuttling. By applying phase-shifted electrical signals, they created a traveling-wave potential that moves electrons through quantum dots across the chip. This allows qubits to interact simply by being brought into proximity, rather than relying on complex wiring to link stationary qubits. The team achieved around 99 percent fidelity in two-qubit gate operations and demonstrated quantum state teleportation with an average fidelity of 87 percent.
The implications for scaling are significant. Mobile qubits could eliminate the need for dense and impractical wiring layouts, enabling dynamic connectivity between qubits during computation. This flexibility supports more efficient quantum error correction and allows specialized regions on a chip for tasks such as measurement or entanglement generation.
Importantly, the system is built using isotopically purified silicon-germanium, a material compatible with existing semiconductor manufacturing processes. This gives it a practical advantage over other quantum platforms that rely on more exotic setups.
The breakthrough comes amid rapid progress in silicon-based quantum technologies, reinforcing the view that mobile qubits may become central to building large-scale, commercially viable quantum processors.
➖
Amazon Degradation Surges Past Deforestation Despite Brazil’s Gains
Brazil is poised to record its lowest Amazon deforestation rate since 2012, yet a more insidious threat is rapidly intensifying: forest degradation. Recent satellite data from Brazil’s DETER system shows that between August 2025 and April 2026, degradation impacted roughly 4,420 square kilometers of rainforest, more than two and a half times the 1,700 square kilometers lost to outright deforestation. Unlike clear-cutting, degradation leaves parts of the canopy standing but weakens the forest’s ecological integrity, now affecting nearly 40% of the Amazon.
The progress in curbing deforestation has been attributed to stronger enforcement under President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, including improved coordination with local authorities. A Global Forest Watch report also noted a 41% decline in non-fire-related forest loss compared to 2024, marking a record low since monitoring began in 2001. However, experts warn that these gains risk being overshadowed by rising degradation driven by wildfires, illegal logging, and intensifying drought conditions.
New threats loom on the horizon. The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has forecast a high probability of El Niño developing in mid-2026, potentially escalating into an extreme event that could amplify drought and fire risks across the Amazon. Simultaneously, proposed legislation in Brazil seeks to restrict the use of satellite-based enforcement tools, a move environmental authorities say would severely weaken oversight.
Compounding concerns, recent research suggests the Amazon may be approaching a tipping point, beyond which large portions could irreversibly shift into degraded ecosystems or savanna, with global climate consequences.
The Sunday Brew by The Percolator brings to you curated news on tech, business & entrepreneurship, from across the internet to give your week a perfect start.
Share your thoughts and opinions on the topics covered in this newsletter by leaving a comment and joining the conversation.







