The Sunday Brew #113
In this brew - Greenland Natural Resources in a picture | Predictive Coding & Apophenia | Meta's Policy Shift, Anthropic seeks $60B valuation and Search for $750M worth Bitcoin stopped
Welcome to The Sunday Brew, weekly 1-2-3 newsletter by The Percolator. Every Sunday we drop in your inbox 1 story in a picture, 2 concepts, ideas or frameworks to expand your horizons and 3 news from the week, to keep you updated.
If you are not a paid subscriber, here is what you missed last week:
ONE STORY IN A PICTURE
TWO IDEAS, FRAMEWORKS OR CONCEPTS
This week we bring to you two concepts - Predictive Coding & Apophenia
Predictive Coding
Predictive coding is a theoretical framework in neuroscience and psychology that describes how the brain processes information by continuously generating and updating predictions about sensory input.
According to this model, the brain constructs a mental representation of the environment, allowing it to anticipate incoming sensory signals based on past experiences. The core mechanism involves comparing these predictions with actual sensory inputs to identify discrepancies, known as prediction errors. When there is a mismatch between expected and actual sensory information, the brain adjusts its predictions accordingly, facilitating learning and refining its internal models over time.
This process operates hierarchically within the brain's cortical structures. Higher-level areas send predictions down to lower-level areas, which then process sensory information and return prediction errors to update higher-level expectations. This dynamic interplay allows for efficient processing and helps the brain adapt to new information.
Predictive coding has significant implications in various fields. In neuroscience, it enhances our understanding of cognitive functions such as perception and action, offering insights into how we learn through self-supervised mechanisms. In the legal domain, predictive coding refers to technology-assisted review processes that utilize machine learning algorithms for e-discovery. Here, the software analyzes large sets of documents for relevance during litigation by learning from manually classified samples and applying this knowledge to predict the relevance of additional documents.
Overall, predictive coding represents a paradigm shift in understanding cognitive processes, emphasizing the importance of prediction and error correction in learning and perception while also finding practical applications in areas like legal technology.
🚀
Apophenia
Apophenia is the psychological phenomenon where individuals perceive meaningful connections or patterns among unrelated or random data, objects, and ideas.
Coined by psychiatrist Klaus Conrad in 1958, the term describes a tendency that can manifest in various ways, such as seeing faces in clouds (pareidolia) or interpreting coincidences as evidence of conspiracies. While apophenia can be a common cognitive bias, it may also indicate psychiatric issues when taken to extremes, such as in schizophrenia, where individuals might see hostile patterns in benign events.
This inclination to find patterns is thought to have evolutionary roots, as recognizing connections could have provided survival advantages by helping early humans identify threats or opportunities. However, this same tendency can lead to erroneous conclusions and misinterpretations, such as the gambler's fallacy—believing that past random events influence future outcomes despite their independence.
Apophenia is prevalent in everyday life and can contribute to superstitions and conspiracy theories. For instance, people might attribute significance to random occurrences or develop elaborate narratives from coincidental events. In research contexts, apophenia can result in false positives when analyzing data, leading to incorrect assumptions about relationships within datasets.
Overall, while apophenia reflects an essential aspect of human cognition—our drive to make sense of the world—it also highlights the potential for misjudgment when interpreting randomness.
THREE NEWS FROM THE WEEK
Meta Announces Major Policy Shift: Ends Fact-Checking and Embraces Community Moderation
Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, has unveiled a significant overhaul of its content moderation policies, marking a departure from its previous reliance on third-party fact-checkers.
In a video titled "More Speech, Fewer Mistakes," CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that the company will implement a Community Notes system, allowing users to flag misleading content instead of utilizing external fact-checking organizations. This decision comes as the U.S. political landscape shifts, particularly with the anticipated return of former President Donald Trump, whose supporters have often criticized social media platforms for perceived censorship.
Zuckerberg argued that the previous fact-checking framework was overly biased and detrimental to free speech. He stated that these changes reflect a broader cultural trend favoring less regulation and more user engagement in content moderation. Critics, however, warn that this shift could lead to an increase in harmful misinformation, especially affecting marginalized communities who may face heightened risks of harassment and misinformation.
In addition to ending its fact-checking program, Meta plans to relax moderation on sensitive topics such as immigration and gender identity. This move has raised concerns among advocacy groups about the potential for increased online abuse and misinformation campaigns targeting vulnerable populations.
The implications of Meta's policy changes are profound, as they signal a pivotal moment in social media governance. While proponents argue that this approach enhances free expression, many experts caution that it may compromise the integrity of online discourse and safety for users.
As Meta prepares to roll out these changes in the coming months, the tech giant faces scrutiny over its commitment to balancing free speech with responsible content management.
➖
Anthropic Seeks $60 Billion Valuation Amid $2 Billion Funding Round
Anthropic, the AI startup co-founded by former OpenAI executives, is reportedly on the verge of raising $2 billion in a funding round that could catapult its valuation to an impressive $60 billion.
This potential increase marks a dramatic rise from its previous valuation of approximately $18 billion just months ago, following a funding round led by Menlo Ventures.The latest investment initiative is being spearheaded by Lightspeed Venture Partners, and if successful, it would bring Anthropic’s total funding to around $6 billion since its founding in 2021. The company has already attracted significant investments from tech giants, including Amazon and Alphabet, with Amazon committing a substantial $8 billion as part of its strategy to enhance its competitive edge in the generative AI market.
Anthropic has gained recognition for its AI chatbot, Claude, which is rapidly becoming a formidable competitor to established players like OpenAI's ChatGPT. The startup has reported annual revenues of approximately $875 million, primarily generated through direct sales and strategic partnerships with cloud service providers.
The anticipated funding round reflects a broader trend in the AI industry, where venture capital investment continues to surge as companies race to innovate and capture market share. With the growing interest from investors in AI technologies, Anthropic's pursuit of a $60 billion valuation underscores the escalating competition among startups in this dynamic sector.
As Anthropic moves forward with its funding efforts, the outcome will not only impact the company's trajectory but also signal investor confidence in the future of AI development and deployment. The outcome of this funding round could reshape the landscape of artificial intelligence and highlight the increasing importance of ethical considerations in AI advancements.
➖
Court Halts $750 Million Bitcoin Recovery Effort from Landfill
In a disappointing turn of events for James Howells, a British IT engineer, a Cardiff High Court has dismissed his decade-long legal battle to recover a hard drive containing approximately 8,000 bitcoins, valued at around $750 million.
The hard drive was mistakenly discarded in 2013 during a routine cleanup and has since been buried in a Newport landfill. Howells had sought permission from Newport City Council to excavate the landfill, proposing to share a portion of any recovered bitcoin with the council and local residents. Despite his offers, which included a £10 million recovery project backed by investors, the council consistently denied his requests, citing environmental concerns and local permit violations.
In his latest legal attempt, Howells requested either access to the landfill or £495 million ($608 million) in damages. However, Judge Keyser KC ruled that the hard drive became the property of the council once it entered the landfill and that excavation would pose significant environmental risks. The judge characterized Howells' claim as lacking reasonable grounds and stated it had “no realistic prospect” of succeeding at trial.
Following the ruling, Howells expressed frustration, describing the decision as unjust and lamenting the loss of his potential fortune. He emphasized that while the court did not dispute his ownership of the bitcoins, he was left with no means to recover them physically. Despite this setback, Howells remains determined to explore innovative approaches to reclaiming value from his lost asset, including potential tokenization of the bitcoin's worth.
This ruling effectively ends a unique legal saga that has captivated cryptocurrency enthusiasts and highlighted the complexities surrounding lost digital assets.
The Sunday Brew by The Percolator brings to you curated news on tech, business & entrepreneurship, from across the internet to give your week a perfect start.
Share your thoughts and opinions on the topics covered in this newsletter by leaving a comment and joining the conversation.